Board memory
Successive boards can inspect the original context
A sourced answer helps the incoming board see the emails and documents behind an older decision instead of debating from fragments.
Private Clubs and Recreation Organizations
Ask what was decided about the facilities, the budget, or the vendor contract, and get a sourced answer from the emails and documents your board shared.
Setup takes minutes. No IT project. No team training.
Capital projects, vendor contracts, membership policies, and facility upgrades all need context that often lives in old email threads.
The current board can see the result but not the reasoning.
Prior terms and promises can be hard to recover.
The recommendation survives after the committee dissolves.
Old debates start over because context is missing.
No app to install. No training for volunteers. No IT project.
BCC board and committee threads worth remembering.
Decisions, commitments, deadlines, and context are organized.
Future boards can understand why prior decisions were made.
See it in action
Question
Dossier
Pacific Catering renewed at $14,200/month for 24 months. The new contract adds Sunday brunch service, extends kitchen hours, and removes the exclusivity clause for private events.
Sources
These are the club questions that usually trigger a scramble through old committee mailboxes and board folders.
When a future board asks why something was done, the answer should still lead back to the committee thread, vendor negotiation, or supporting document.
Board memory
A sourced answer helps the incoming board see the emails and documents behind an older decision instead of debating from fragments.
Committee traceability
Finance, grounds, and membership committee discussions remain attached to the decision rather than disappearing after the committee disbands.
Operational confidence
Contract terms, scope changes, and follow-up commitments keep pointing back to the record the board can review.
Pricing
$99/month per club.
Unlimited users. Unlimited threads.
Less than the cost of one board meeting spent re-debating something that was already decided.
We'll follow up with setup details and next steps.
Dossier is meant to make board turnover less painful without forcing volunteers into a new operating system.
Yes. Committee threads and documents are often where the useful context lives. Sharing them makes later board decisions easier to understand and defend.
Yes. That is a strong fit. Clubs can recover prior terms, scope changes, and follow-up commitments without relying on whichever director handled the last negotiation.
Dossier still helps from the record you have. It does not require a perfect archive before it becomes useful.
No. It complements them by making the discussions and source material behind those records easier to recover.
Your threads are never used to train AI models. Data is transmitted over an encrypted connection. Only members you invite can see your Dossier, and you can delete your data, export it, or close your account at any time.